Sepsis occurrence in Ontario hospitals (2024)

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death in hospitals β€” so Caring Magazine investigated the prevalence of sepsis in Ontario hospitals. We care because patients and their caregivers care.

Table of contents

What is sepsis?

Sepsis arises when the body's response to an infection injures its own tissues and organs. This condition can begin with any type of infection, but most commonly, it starts with bacterial infections in the lungs, urinary tract, skin, or gastrointestinal tract. The body's immune system, which normally fights off infection, goes into overdrive, releasing a flood of chemical signals that can lead to widespread inflammation. This inflammation can trigger a cascade of changes that damage multiple organ systems, leading them to fail.

The progression from infection to sepsis to severe sepsis and finally to septic shock reflects an escalating severity. Severe sepsis is characterized by significant drops in blood pressure and dysfunction of at least one organ, while septic shock is severe sepsis with extremely low blood pressure that does not adequately respond to simple fluid replacement.

Symptoms of sepsis can include high fever, rapid heart rate, rapid breathing, pain, pale or discolored skin, sleepiness, confusion, and feeling the sickest one has ever felt. Because it can escalate quickly, prompt medical attention is crucial. Treatment typically involves administering antibiotics, maintaining blood flow to organs with intravenous fluids, and, in more severe cases, using medications to stabilize blood pressure and, if necessary, dialysis or mechanical ventilation to support organ function.

Understanding sepsis and its potential to lead to dramatic, life-threatening conditions underscores the importance of early detection and rapid response. This is why healthcare providers are keenly focused on identifying symptoms of sepsis in patients, particularly those who are already vulnerable due to other underlying health conditions, to initiate treatment as swiftly as possible.

[optin-monster-inline slug="siaqij7g9exzrjlf1ol0"]

What are Ontario hospitals with the lowest sepsis occurrence?

Below are top five hospitals with the lowest sepsis occurrence.

  • πŸ₯‡ Perth and Smiths Falls District Hospital, ranked first with a sepsis occurrence rate of 0.4 per 1,000 discharges, signifies that approximately 1 in 2,500 patients develops sepsis during their hospital stay.
  • πŸ₯ˆ Huron Perth Healthcare Alliance, securing the second position with a sepsis occurrence rate of 1.0 per 1,000 discharges, translates to approximately 1 in 1,000 patients developing sepsis.
  • πŸ₯‰ Woodstock Hospital, ranked third with a sepsis occurrence rate of 1.1 per 1,000 discharges, reflects a relatively low incidence of sepsis, equivalent to approximately 1 in 909 patients.

What are Ontario hospitals with the highest sepsis occurrence?

Below are top five hospitals with the highest sepsis occurrence.

  • North Shore Health Network, ranked first with a sepsis occurrence rate of 11 per 1,000 discharges, indicates that approximately 1 in 91 patients develops sepsis.
  • Haldimand War Memorial Hospital, securing the second position with a sepsis occurrence rate of 9 per 1,000 discharges, translates to approximately 1 in 111 patients developing sepsis.
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, ranked third with a sepsis occurrence rate of 9 per 1,000 discharges, also reflects a concerning frequency of sepsis cases, equivalent to approximately 1 in 111 patients. The complex patient population, including critically ill and immunocompromised patients, may contribute to the higher sepsis occurrence rate at the center.
  • Norfolk General Hospital, securing the fourth position with a sepsis occurrence rate of 7 per 1,000 discharges, translates to approximately 1 in 143 patients developing sepsis.
  • Hamilton Health Sciences ranks fifth with a sepsis occurrence rate of 6 per 1,000 discharges, equivalent to 1 in 167 patients developing sepsis.

What might high sepsis occurrence mean?

A high in-hospital sepsis prevalence indicates a significant number of patients within a healthcare facility are developing or have developed sepsis during their hospital stay. This situation is concerning for several reasons.

Firstly, it suggests a potential issue with infection control practices within the hospital. Hospitals have strict protocols to prevent infections, including sterilization procedures, hand hygiene practices, and isolation protocols for contagious diseases. A high rate of sepsis could point to lapses in these practices, leading to an increased rate of infections that escalate to sepsis.

Secondly, a high prevalence of sepsis in a hospital may reflect on the patient population's vulnerability. Patients with compromised immune systems, such as those undergoing chemotherapy, with chronic diseases, or the elderly, are at a higher risk of developing sepsis. A hospital treating a large number of such high-risk patients might naturally see higher sepsis rates.

Furthermore, high sepsis rates can have significant implications for patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Sepsis is associated with high mortality rates, long-term effects on survivors, and substantial healthcare expenses due to extended hospital stays and the need for intensive treatments and interventions.

Finally, tracking and addressing high sepsis prevalence is crucial for healthcare quality improvement. It prompts hospitals to investigate the causes, implement corrective actions to prevent infection and improve patient care, and ultimately reduce sepsis rates. This not only enhances patient safety and outcomes but also aligns with healthcare quality standards and regulatory requirements aimed at reducing healthcare-associated infections and improving hospital performance.

What might low sepsis occurrence mean?

A low in-hospital sepsis prevalence might initially seem positive, suggesting effective infection control, timely identification, and management of infections before they escalate to sepsis. However, several factors and data issues could distort this figure, making it appear lower than the actual situation, which requires careful consideration.

Underreporting and Misdiagnosis: One of the primary concerns is the underreporting or misdiagnosis of sepsis cases. Healthcare professionals might not recognize early signs of sepsis, especially in patients with complex medical histories or nonspecific symptoms, leading to underdiagnosis. Similarly, inconsistencies in how sepsis is defined and diagnosed can contribute to underreporting.

Coding and Documentation Practices: The way sepsis cases are coded and documented in hospital records can also affect reported prevalence rates. Variations in coding practices and inaccuracies in medical documentation can lead to sepsis cases being overlooked or not properly recorded, thus not reflected in the data.

Patient Population: The characteristics of the patient population a hospital serves can impact sepsis prevalence. Hospitals specializing in certain types of care (e.g., elective surgeries) may naturally have lower sepsis rates compared to those treating more high-risk patients (e.g., intensive care or oncology patients). Therefore, low sepsis prevalence might not accurately reflect a hospital's quality of care but rather the nature of its patient demographics.

Quality Improvement Initiatives: Hospitals actively engaged in quality improvement initiatives targeting infection prevention and early sepsis recognition may genuinely have lower sepsis rates. However, without comparing these rates to benchmarks or considering the scope of such initiatives, it can be challenging to interpret the significance of low prevalence.

Data Collection and Analysis Methods: The methodologies used for collecting and analyzing sepsis data can influence reported rates. Inconsistent data collection methods, differences in surveillance definitions, and variations in analytical techniques can all contribute to lower apparent sepsis prevalence.

To accurately interpret low in-hospital sepsis prevalence, it's essential to consider these potential data issues and contextual factors. Comprehensive approaches to data collection, standardized diagnostic criteria, and robust quality control measures are necessary to ensure the reliability of sepsis reporting and to support meaningful improvements in patient care and outcomes.

You cannot copy content of this page